Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Su Jeong Jang vs Gabriela Lee Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jang vs Lee analysis and find out who is favored!
Su Jeong Jang vs Gabriela Lee Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jang 2 - 0 Lee
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jang has won 45.97% of points on their second serve, while Lee has won 49.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jang, in recent form, has won 53.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lee has won 55.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.51% and 45.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jang has saved 45.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lee has saved 54.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jang has won 56.86% of matches played (W/L 29/ 22), with Lee winning 57.14% (W/L 24/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 220/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17), where as Lee has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jang winning 2 times and Lee being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Jang winning 4 and Lee winning 1. The last match between Jang and Lee was at the W75 Doksy - Stare Splavy, 26-06-2024, First, Clay with Su Jeong Jang getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:45:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jang and Lee have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jang winning 1 times and Lee 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jang winning 0, and Lee 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.75 while Lee has played against players with an average rank of 220.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jang has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lee has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jang has converted 49.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lee has converted 51.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
232
Rank
114
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
345
Rank
136
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
60% (422-283)
Career Total W/L
56% (276-215)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
63% (15-9)
$340,345
Career Prize Money
$95,566
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Su Jeong Jang vs Gabriela Lee For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jang VS Lee
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Su Jeong Jang | Gabriela Lee |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:45:30 | 0:45:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (33/50) | 55% (31/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (27/33) | 55% (17/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (8/17) | 48% (12/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (27/56) | 30% (15/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Su Jeong Jang | Gabriela Lee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 65% (15/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (40/23) | 62% (34/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (325/257) | 56% (289/229) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (5/1) | 70% (14/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:45 | 1:51:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 284.82 | 210.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1097/1593) | 67% (1127/1686) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (676/1097) | 61% (682/1127) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (228/496) | 49% (275/558) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (111/225) | 52% (117/226) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (793/1704) | 48% (833/1721) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (14/9) | 67% (12/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (18/28) | 65% (15/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 29% (7/2) |
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Su Jeong Jang
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Julie Pastikova
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Panna Udvardy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Haruna Arakawa
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yuki Naito
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriela Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Anna Siskova
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
49%
(
42 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Amalia Suciu
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Gabriela Lee
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
55%
(
52 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Charo Esquiva Banuls
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Maryna Kolb
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Gabriela Lee
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Astra Sharma
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Mai Hontama
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jang Vs Lee Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jang are available here and Lee photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gabriela Lee
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
